Culture has changed and we must change with it…
For the last decade we have celebrated, described, deconstructed, and devoted countless articles to extolling the who, what, why and how of earning brand trust. It is essential to belief and acceptance of what brands want consumers to understand about their narrative story. It stands at the front door of why consumers join a brand as believers rather than merely episodic (and occasionally fickle) purchasers.
We have alternately described this marketing era as the trust/sharing economy of the last decade. As evidence, consider the generation of disruptive apps like Yelp, Uber, and Airbnb that created massive markets built on legislating trust by integrating:
- Commitment to transparency
- Implementing layers of reassurance
- • Shining a spotlight on every facet of an interaction
These systems provide an unprecedented amount of perceived control, allowing us to trust complete strangers. Significant levels of value have been generated, and thus how the trust economy prospered. There’s also an unexpected consequence to an engineered trust optimization strategy. Stay with us.
With this foundation, we have charted the benefits of radical openness, of higher purpose and mission as evidence of deeper brand meaning and respected values. We’ve described the beneficial outcomes of revealing an organization’s inner mechanics — how you do what you do. Show it, demonstrate it, don’t just claim it. The theory at work – alongside deeper understanding and disclosure, trust will break out. Some of this thinking by the way, remains true and relevant.
- Our strategic brand-building game plan was constructed on authoring control and certainty for consumers who also crave it. It mattered because risk of disappointment is a fundamental barrier to what brands most want: a consumer who believes and accepts their story and acts on it. However, times have changed. Dramatically so. Unprecedented shifts and moves have occurred that re-calibrate the entire foundation of what ‘trust’ actually means and how to acquire it.
Make no mistake, trust remains foundational to building business, but how we define trust has moved. What’s changed?
The 2025 Brand Trust Analysis
We’ve observed the rapid decline of trust within shifting consumer culture. Look at it this way: when trust in people evaporates, you lose trust in nearly everything.
We lack trust in our government
We don’t trust our neighbors
We don’t trust our educational institutions
We may even lack trust in our friends
In sum, we are far less trusting today than we were before the trust economy came to the forefront. The strategic answer lies in a fundamental recognition of societal shifts and how trust is defined.
Let’s start with a more humanized way of looking at it, according to a recent report from the Concept Bureau:
“[Trust is] the willingness to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectation that the other will perform a particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to monitor or control that other party.” An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review
For the most part we’ve arrrived at a place where people generally trust no one. Certainty has disappeared. Familiar anchors of traditional beliefs, meaning, values, history and security have been diminished by unprecedented events that are connected to how people see themselves and the rules we have been taught about how society is supposed to operate. In sum:
- Our long-standing traditions and values are under assault.
- Even traditional family ties have weakened as people seek guidance from other external sources, some AI driven.
- Respect for a fairly distributed quality of life, and embedded empathetic behavior towards others is in retreat.
- The past vanishes behind us while the future loses its luster and in its place people begin to turn inward.
- Promises and values we have long held in high esteem wither in a sea of disruption.
We know from research that technology has changed how we place trust, and it appears we’ve been successful optimizing away perceived risk.
The key evolutionary trust insight
Trust isn’t really centered in control. It was never about perceived safety, transparency or insurance. In reality, trust is the opposite. It is a willingness of people to make themselves vulnerable to someone else, precisely when they can’t be controlled.
Trust is about embracing risk rather than mitigating it away. Nothing can be accomplished without trust, and if we’re building a brighter future, this a dilemma we need resolve now. If we know trust is inherently tied to vulnerability, then we need to be looking where/how people are allowing themselves to be vulnerable.
The new trust building engine is embracing vulnerability. Here’s the guidance:
1. From proof to empathy: trust as a human exchange
Traditionally, brands earned trust through evidence from third-party endorsements, scientific validation, guarantees, warranties, ratings, and reviews. Those things reduce risk.
But vulnerability asks something different — it requires empathy and shared humanity.
Brand translation:
- Move from “credible authority” to “we see you — we understand your fears, hopes, and imperfections.”
- Brands demonstrate this by acknowledging uncertainty, showing learning in progress, and inviting co-creation rather than just broadcasting behind-the-curtain details.
- Example: A pet food brand that decides to re-evaluate its sourcing practices and brings the brand community along for the discovery process.
2. Vulnerability as an invitation, not an exposure
Vulnerability creates relational depth. When a brand lets its audience in — shows its inner workings, admits mistakes, or opens its process — it transforms from provider to partner.
Brand practices that operationalize this:
- Open book storytelling: Show the making, the sourcing, the human decision trade-offs. Don’t sanitize the narrative; show the nuance.
- Interactive co-creation: Invite consumers to test prototypes, weigh in on reformulations, or help define what improvement means.
- Employee voices: Authentic, unscripted stories from the people behind the brand humanize the enterprise and show vulnerability through human faces, rather than corporate polish.
3. Reciprocal vulnerability: trust as a shared act
Consumers also practice vulnerability — every purchase is a small leap of faith. They reveal their personal values, fears, and aspirations in what they choose.
Brands can mirror that by showing they’re equally invested — willing to take emotional and ethical risks in service of the relationship.
How that looks:
- Values leadership: Taking courageous stands on cultural or environmental issues, not because it’s safe, but because it’s right for the brand’s identity.
- Responsiveness: Listening publicly, not privately — using consumer feedback to shape decisions in real time.
- Long-term consistency: Following through over years, not campaigns, turns initial vulnerability into mutual confidence.
4. Trust 2.0: from control to connection
Old trust mechanics were built on risk management, scripted messaging, brand guardianship.
The new model invites brands to trade some of that control for coherence: shared stories, aligned intentions, and human-scale openness and honesty.
Strategic shifts:
| Old Trust | New Trust |
| Control the experience | Share the journey |
| Risk mitigation | Emotional openness |
| Credible authority | Reciprocity |
| Transparency | Progress |
| Proof | Presence |
5. Framework for brand application
The Vulnerability Activation Model:
| Stage | Brand Behavior | Consumer Response |
Reveal | Share authentic challenges, trade-offs, or learnings | Curiosity, empathy |
| Invite | Engage consumers in shaping or validating change | Participation, belonging |
| Align | Demonstrate shared values in action | Identification, loyalty |
| Sustain | Continue showing progress over time | Enduring trust |
Vulnerability is the next frontier of innovation. This vacuum and its generative force really push us because on the surface, it feels counterintuitive. However, there is simply no other way to create the deep connection people are seeking.
If this article has you thinking about how the evolution of trust building strategy, the importance of vulnerability to your brand and business, use the link below to ask questions and have an open (more vulnerable?) and honest conversation. We can help you build the roadmap.
Looking for more food for thought? Subscribe to the Emerging Trends Report.
Bob Wheatley is the CEO of Chicago-based Emergent. Traditional brand marketing often sidesteps more human qualities that can help consumers form an emotional bond. Yet brands yearn for authentic engagement, trust and a lasting relationship with their customers. For more information, contact Bob@Emergent-Comm.com and follow on Twitter @BobWheatley.